p.p1 are three main parts of his argument.

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px ‘Comic Sans MS’; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000}
p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px ‘Comic Sans MS’; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000; min-height: 16.0px}
span.s1 {font-kerning: none}
span.Apple-tab-span {white-space:pre}

A Disquisition on Government was written by Senator John C. Calhoun, from south Carolina and was published in 1851. This 100 page disquisition serves the idea of a concurrent majority in order to protect in what he thought to be the souths interests. The Disquisition, and other writings increased the feeling of sectionalism in the South and led ultimately to secession and the American Civil War.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The Disquisition on Government is a 100 page essay on his ideas on the government, which he worked on for six years until it was completed in 1849. what this shows is his argument that the majority of the government will typically impose a despotism over a minority unless some how, some way it is devised to secure the assent of all sections, classes and interests, that would be human depravity would debase government in a democracy.

He tries to show in the Disquisition of Government, that a majority rule by equal and competent individuals counterbalances a minority rule for a society that has a balance of liberty, rights and power. There are three main parts of his argument. 

The first part of his argument goes into the nature of man and government. This part goes into the role of natural vs. implied rights and its role in the creation of a government. The second part of his argument deals with the concurrent vs. numerical majority, which deals with the majority against the ideals of a minority and a numerical faction. The third part of his argument talks about the liberty, rights, power and security.
He saw himself as the other of Thomas Jefferson and the Republican tradition, but he was a very active Republican that rejected both the liberal philosophy of natural rights and the Enlightenment’s positivist view of human nature and human societies.
He says that all people of the governments, whoever they were, whether it was the Romans or the American Indians needed some kind of structure that they need rules and some kind of government. He also believed that the government and social order controls the feelings and impulses and also makes man to live or the good of his society, not exactly for the good of himself. Which means that the man would typically not look for himself but for everyone around them. 

He states the “Will be found in the fact that while man is created for the social state and is accordingly so formed as to feel more intensely what affects him directly than what affects him indirectly through others I intentionally avoid the expression selfish feelings because, as commonly used.” What he is saying here is that it an unusual excess of the individual over the social feelings in the person to who it is applied to. 

There is no saying that the prophetic truth of one of A Discourse’s passages was not true. He did show a lot  from all the twentieth-century mass democratic political machine in action. He states that “The numerical majority,” he warns, ” should usually be one of the sole elements of a constitutional democracy; but to make it the sole element, in order to perfect the constitution and make the government more popular, is one of the greatest and most fatal of political errors.”